![]() In response to the existence of this God, a variety of responses and perspectives arise that allow the listener to really explore the nature of His existence, if He does exist at all. This is the God most familiar to Western society, and the God to whom the most consideration is brought, to determine whether or not it is plausible that He should exist. The all knowing, all-powerful, infinitely merciful and benevolent God that exists outside of space and time, as we know Him today, is the focus of the later conversation during this episode. Sinnott-Armstrong doubts that any of these are real reasons. Lastly, John mentions the defense that occurs through revelation. Another approach is through personal experience, where someone claims to simply have a feeling about God. The second thought is that given the way the world is, it could not have been the result of an accident, and this defines the argument from design. The first is the a priori ontological defense of God, which is completely logic based. ![]() John identifies a number of defenses of the existence of God. The guest on the show, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, introduces the idea that there are necessary components needed to establish a God of the traditional sort, which restrict what God can be like. ![]() The belief in God.is it something that is reasonable, something that can be defended by proof and evidence? Or is it something that must be accepted solely on faith, irreducible to logic? John notes that there are many different conceptions of God, some of which are more believable than others. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |